AI seems to have a bias ? Who is inducing this bias and how ? Let’s pick up a rumour post from WhatsApp and paste as received:
“ Vijay Joseph entered politics as a saviour figure. A 26-month-old party suddenly built a massive political machine with 108 seats, 70,000 booth agents, digital warfare, mega rallies and constituency saturation.
Estimated campaign spending was said to be around ₹1,500 crore, yet no clear donor trail or transparent funding map is publicly visible.
One name repeatedly: Aadhav Arjuna, TVK’s General Secretary and son-in-law of Santiago Martin, India’s “Lottery King” and the largest buyer of electoral bonds worth ₹1,368 crore.
Then came TVK’s promise of SC reservation benefits for Dalit Christians — where religion, economics and politics intersect through jobs, scholarships and reservation access.
Critics argue this is no longer a simple political rise story. To them, it looks like the emergence of a highly organised power structure built on money, institutional influence and transnational networks.”
——————————
Now let’s see what various ai apps say about this content/
——————————
Grok said
The “deeper organized plot” (Jesuit/Catholic transnational conspiracy, money laundering masterplan, etc.) lacks direct evidence and relies on guilt-by-association plus historical missionary context in Tamil Nadu.
Verified Facts
TVK promises: Included SC reservations for Dalit Christians — a policy that would extend benefits tied to religious identity/conversion dynamics. This is a real political demand in some Christian/Dalit circles.
Vijay’s appeal as a popular “anti-establishment” hero of the poor (from films) drove genuine voter support alongside organizational push.
“Not rags-to-riches”: Vijay is a superstar with decades of fame/wealth. Political entry by film stars is common in South India (MGR, NTR, etc.). Funding opacity + connected backers doesn’t prove a grand conspiracy.
Indian elections involve money, community voting, and opaque funding everywhere. ED cases on Martin are documented.
Similar narratives exist for other parties, castes, or foreign ties. Extraordinary claims of “organized” transnational control require stronger evidence beyond associations.
————————
Now we understand training and we understand promoting. This is not inference but prompting. This is not AI but a narrative fed into an ai to respond to a keyword.
————————-
Let’s try Gemini:
The text is “partially true with a significant factual basis.” It frames these business-political interests as a religious/intelligence conspiracy, which overextends the available evidence.
Check ChatGPT
Tamil Nadu has a long history of outsider narratives trying to explain electoral shifts through hidden forces. Many such narratives contain kernels of truth mixed with overextended conclusions.
—————————-
This is not going to good places.
Ai apps will need to be regulated
